Student graduation outcomes are shown here to provide stakeholders with the data regarding the retention and successes of the Minerva Schools at KGI.
The Minerva Schools at KGI ( MSKGI) focuses on the success of our students. We provide active learning in an all-seminar program because this form of pedagogy has been shown to be superior to traditional lecture-based instruction. Our students learn to work as individuals and as members of teams, and learn habits of mind and foundational concepts that will serve them in good stead for a lifetime. We also support co-curricular and extracurricular opportunities and provide robust student support services to assist students through challenges they may face while enrolled in our programs.
One of the key characteristics of MSKGI is its global character. Students come to Minerva from all over the world to study and undergraduate students live in seven major world cities during the four-year undergraduate program. All undergraduate students are full-time.
We have 618 students studying in the 2020-2021 Academic Year. This year students are studying in San Francisco, Berlin, and London in the Fall and San Francisco, Taipei, and Seoul. Because of the pandemic, approximately a quarter of our students are studying remotely. They come from approximately 60 different countries, with no single country dominating the enrollment. They are approximately half men and half women.
As demonstrated in the table below, Minerva’s retention overall is currently at 92% (636+104+119/ 934). Retention from first year to second year for each cohort has ranged from 89% to 98%.
* The Founding Class from 2014-2015 had a gap year during 2015-2016 and joined together with the 2015 matriculating Inaugural Class for the 2016-2017 academic year.
** Includes 18 students on Leave of Absence with intent to return.
* %=Total number of graduates/# matriculated four or five years earlier.
Degree Learning Objectives
Minerva expects all undergraduate students to meet Degree Learning Objectives ( DLOs.) These DLOs are introduced in the ﬁrst-year Cornerstone courses and consist of “habits of mind” and “foundational concepts” ( HCs,) which are applied and assessed throughout the four years of study. A habit of mind is a mental skill that comes to be triggered automatically with practice; a foundational concept is fundamental knowledge that is broadly applicable, which typically does require deliberation. Each of the four core competencies, Thinking Critically, Thinking Creatively, Interacting Eﬀectively, and Communicating Eﬀectively, are broken down into more speciﬁc aspects (sub-competencies), and each of these aspects, in turn, includes a set of habits of mind and foundational concepts. MSKGI uses both internal and external assessments to measure student learning.
Analyses of the Core Competencies
The habits of mind and foundational concepts derived from Minerva’s core competencies are introduced in the ﬁrst-year Cornerstone courses and continue to be assessed over the next three years in every Minerva course. This results in continuous evaluation of student performance on MSKGI’s undergraduate degree learning outcomes. Outcome data are analyzed at the end of each year. The Benchmark is set at a benchmark of 3.0 (Knowledge) on the rubric scale of 1-5. Year indicates the cohort’s expected graduation or year of graduation in the case of 2020. Please note that it has been a trend over multiple years that the percentage of students achieving the Benchmark is lower in their ﬁrst year and increases in subsequent years.
As students continue to be directly assessed in later courses on the habits of mind and foundation concepts introduced in the ﬁrst-year curriculum, they receive feedback on their ability to transfer ( utilize) these outcomes to their upper-division coursework. The percentages are the proportion of students receiving a mean of 3.0 ( Knowledge) or higher on the rubric scale of 1-5.
Minerva administered the CLA+ test to provide an outside assessment of the eﬀectiveness of aspects of the ﬁrst-year curriculum ( a subset of the critical thinking and problem-solving learning outcomes we teach). The assessment was given at the beginning and end of the fall and spring terms to ﬁrst-year students and at graduation. The Council for Aid to Education administers the CLA+ each year to more than 20,000 undergraduate students attending approximately 100 diﬀerent colleges and universities. More information about the CLA+ is available here. The table below gives the percentiles that Minerva students achieved when compared with freshmen and seniors at other institutions.
Minerva administers multiple surveys throughout the year to collect self-reported data from students. The 2019-2020 surveys, plus other tracking measures, covered the Graduating classes of 2019 and 2020 and the four cohorts of 2020 through 2023, providing the following data on student self-reported engagement and learning.
This 21-month, part-time graduate program is designed to impart key professional skills, with an emphasis on research, analysis, and practical decision-making. Students learn how to interpret complex data, ﬁnd rational conclusions, devise potential solutions, and evaluate the implications of their choices.
The ﬁrst pilot cohort of master’s students participated in a 12-month full-time program and matriculated in September 2017. Upon their graduation, the program was redesigned as a 21-month part-time program and relaunched one year later. Master’s students may extend their thesis work for up to one year from the expected graduation date. Because of Covid-19, we provided an additional extension for the current cohort.
*3 graduated in 2019; 1 withdrew; 2 are on Leave of Absence with intent to return; 2 are on thesis extensions, on track to finish by 12/2020.
The following learning outcomes are associated with the MDA degree:
The Benchmark is set at a benchmark of 3.0 (Knowledge) on the rubric scale of 1-5 for the learning outcomes across the eight courses taken.
MDA graduates work in a wide variety of sectors, including but not limited to science, education, government, technology, and ﬁnance. Their roles are similarly diverse, including founders (29%), chief executives (18%), and managerial/directorial roles (29%).
* Includes students still working on thesis